Crashing Project Evaluation by Managing Allocation Resource and Cost using CPM-PERT and MS,Project in Nurul Hayat Mosque’s Renovation

 Abstract views: 53 ,  downloads: 32
  • Nur Rizka Athira
  • Dea Ayu Maharani Andris Untag Surabaya
  • Siti Muhimatul Khoiroh Untag Surabaya
Keywords: Crashing Project, CPM-PERT, Ms. Project

Abstract

The implementation of project management must be calculated based on time and cost estimation. One of the efficiency measures that can take is to accelerate. Time, cost, and quality are factors that must consider while making project acceleration. Project renovation in Nurul Hayat's room was chosen in this research because this project experienced delays in implementation. Delays occur due to a lack of available manpower. This delay will certainly have an impact on costs. The purpose of this research is to speed up time and get optimum costs while still paying attention to quality standards. By CPM-PERT approach, and the evaluation of project acceleration with Ms. Project, the results obtained are scheduling the initial completion of the mosque renovation which initially has an estimated 42 days with a normal total cost of 17,227,500, can be accelerated for 36 working days with additional processing costs of Rp. 70,000 and overtime costs of Rp. 1,635,000. The total cost is Rp 18,932,500

Keyword: Crashing Project, CPM-PERT, Ms. Project

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdurrasyid, Luqman, Haris, A., & Indrianto. (2019). Implementation of PERT and CPM Methods on Shipbuilding Project Management Information System. Journal of Computer Science and Informatics, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp:28-36.
Abror, H. (2008). Project Management. ANDI.
Arianie, G. P., & Puspitasari, N. B. (2017). Project Management Planning in Improving Efficiency and Effectiveness of Company Resources (Case Study: Qiscus Pte Ltd). J@ti Undip: Jurnal Teknik Industri, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp : 189-196.
Dannyanti. (2011). Optimalisasi Pelaksanaan Proyek dengan Metode PERT dan CPM (Studi Kasus Twin Tower Building Pasca Sarjana Undip).
Dimyati, D., & Nurjaman, K. (2014). Project Management. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Setia.
Gunasti, A., Rofiqi , A., & Priyono, P. (2019). Application of the Barchart, CPM, PERT and Crashing Project Methods in Scheduling the G . Building Construction Project Muhammadiyah University of Jember. Jurnal Rekayasa Tenik Sipil Universitas Madura, Vol. 4 No.1 , pp : 7-12.
Herjanto, E. (2008). Manajemen Operasi,. 3rd ed. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Utomo, G., Hendriyani, I., & Aida, S. (2020). Drainage Project Implementation Evaluation With The CPM And PERT Method. Media Ilmiah Teknik Sipil, Vol.9, No.1, pp: 44-52.
Simatupang, J., Dundu, A., & Sibi, M. (2015). The Effect Of Acceleration Of Duration On Time On Construction Projects (Case Study: Eben Haezar Manado School Development). Jurnal Sipil Statik, Vol.3 No.5, pp: 281-280.
Wohon, F., Mandagi, R., & Pratasis, P. (2015). Analysis Of The Effect Of Duration Acceleration On Cost Projects Using The Microsoft Project 2013 (Case Study: Gmim Syaloom Church Development Karombasan). Jurnal Sipil Statik , Vol.3 No.2, pp: 141-50.
Published
2021-07-31
How to Cite
Athira , N. R., Andris, D. A. M., & Khoiroh, S. M. (2021). Crashing Project Evaluation by Managing Allocation Resource and Cost using CPM-PERT and MS,Project in Nurul Hayat Mosque’s Renovation. Tibuana, 4(02), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.36456/tibuana.4.02.3770.69-82
Section
Articles