Implementation of Decision Tree and Item Response Theory (IRT) in SIMPATIF (Sistem Penilaian Adaptif)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36456/best.vol7.no1.10317Keywords:
Item Response Theory, Computer Adaptive Testing, Computer Based Testing, Paper And Pencil TestAbstract
This study discusses how to accurately determine the level of ability of students using Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT). In the implementation of CAT, test participants are given question items according to their abilities. This shows the difference from existing testing systems such as Computer Based Testing (CBT). ADAPTIVE in this system is an automated exam system that is carried out adaptively, adjusting the difficulty level of the questions to the ability of each examinee. The questions given depend on the answer to the previous question: true or false. If the answer is correct, then the next question item has a higher level of difficulty, while if it is wrong, the difficulty level of the next question decreases. CAT in this study is also called the term SIMPATIF (Adaptive Assessment System). The difference between CAT and SIMPATIF is from the selection of question items, in the test using the SIMPATIF application, the selection of question items using the C4.5 algorithm and IRT 3 Parameter Logistics Model (3PL). The 3 parameters are the difficulty level of the question, differentiation, and deceit. In the development of this SIMPATIF. The input attributes from the decision tree have 4 attributes, namely difficulty level, differentiation, deceiver and IRT, while the target attributes are 2, namely YES and NO. The questions used are productive subjects majoring in Multimedia at SMK PGRI 2 Sidoarjo. The study was conducted with 10 students, SIMPATIF only succeeded in 67,901% for the adaptive status of the questions. Meanwhile, if correlated with CBT 76.58%.
References
Suwarto, 2011, Classical Test Theory and Modern Test Theory.
Arikunto Suharsimi, 2008, Basics of Educational Evaluation (Revised Edition), Bumi Aksara.
Djemari Mardapi, Prof. Ph.D. and Haryanto, Dr. M.Pd and Samsul, Hadi, 2012, Development of Computerized Adaptive Testing System, LPPM UNY
Erhan Delen, 2015, Enhancing a Computer-Based Testing Environment with Optimum Item Response Time, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education
Wahyudin, 2009, Iterative Dichotomizer 3 (ID3) Method for New Student Admission Selection, JPTIK
Susanto, S., & Suryadi, D. 2010. Introduction to Data Mining Exploring Knowledge from Chunks of Data. Yogyakarta: CV. ANDI OFFSET
Goodness, Santosa. 2007. Data Mining Techniques for Data Utilization for Business Purposes. Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta.
Del Sorbo Maria Rosaria, and Walter Balzano, e-Xamina: an experimental multi-user assessment platform for Computer Adaptive Testing, IEEE International Conference on Technology for Education, 2011.
Phankokkruad Manop, Association Rules for Data Mining in Item Classification Algorithm: Web Service Approach, IEEE, 2012.
Junhua Chen, Wei Lai and Tang Ying. A Secure And High Efficent Computerized Adaptive Testing Scheme For Computer Courses Based On Identity, IEEE, 2013.
Ueno Maomi, Pokpong Songmuang, Computerized Adaptive Testing based on Decision Tree. IEEE, 2010.
Crisp Geoffrey, The e-Assessment Handbook, Continuum International Publishing Group, 2007.
Crocker, L. and Algina, J. Introduction to Classical and Modern Test, Theory_New
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Norma Devi Kurniasari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.











