Emotional Engagement in Undergraduate Thesis Writing: Systematic Review

 Abstract views: 290

Authors

  • Moesarofah Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
  • Endah Yulia Rahayu Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36456/bp.vol19.no1.a6823

Keywords:

Student emotion, Writing undergraduate thesis, Systematic review

Abstract

This systematic review of the last seven years aims to identify and analyze emotional engagement in academic writing or undergraduate thesis. Referring to Pekrun's academic, emotional theory, the object focus in writing a thesis is loaded with emotional content besides cognitive and social aspects. The discrepancy between the error and the targeted plan evokes positive and negative emotions. Ten relevant studies in the literature search between 2016-2022 are included in the review, indicating that the research theme requires the attention of researchers to develop further studies. The results of the review show that anxiety is the dominant emotion students feel when writing their undergraduate thesis in various countries. The review results are grouped into theoretical basis, research methods, and relevant results. Implications for future research indicate that self-regulation and strengthening the social environment bring positive consequences in writing an undergraduate thesis. Meanwhile, the study’s limitations are related to the inclusion criteria that are too restrictive.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Moesarofah, Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

Prodi Bimbingan dan Konseling

Endah Yulia Rahayu, Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris

References

Abdulkareem, M. N. (2013). An investigation study of academic writing problems faced by Arab postgraduate students at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM). Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(9), 1552–1557. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.9.1552-1557

Ahern, Kathy, and Catherine Manathunga. 2003. “Clutch-starting Stalled Research Students.”Innovative Higher Education 28 (4): 237–254.

Ahonen, E., K. Pyhältö, J. Pietarinen, and T. Soini. 2015. “Becoming a Teacher – Student Teachers’ Key Learning Experiences.” International Journal of Higher Education 4 (1): 151–165.

Aljafen, B. S. (2013). Writing anxiety among EFL Saudi students in science colleges and departments at a Saudi university (Unpublished master’s thesis). Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA.

Aloairdhi, N. M. (2019). Writing Anxiety Among Saudi Female Learners at Some Saudi Universities. English Language Teaching, 12(9), 55. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n9p55

Anttila, Henrika, Kirsi Pyhältö, Tiina Soini, and Janne Pietarinen. 2017. “From Anxiety to Enthusiasm: Emotional Patterns among Student Teachers.” European Journal of Teacher Education 40(4):447–64. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2017.1349095.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.

Beer, Nils. 2011. “Effects of Positive Metacognitions and Meta-emotions on Coping, Stress Perception and Emotions.” Doctorate of Philosophy, London Metropolitan University

Benesch, S. (2012). Considering emotions in critical English language teaching: Theories and praxis. New York: Routledge

Cheng, Y. S. (2004). A measure of second language writing anxiety: scale development and preliminary validation. J. Second Lang. Writing 13, 313–335. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.07.001

Daly, J. (1977). The effects of writing apprehension on message encoding. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 54, 566–572

Daly, J. A., & Miller, M. D. (1975). The empirical development of an instrument to measure writing apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 9(1), 242-249.

Erickson, G. A. S., Soukup, J. H., Noonan, P. M., & McGurn, L. (2015). Self-Regulation Questionnaire. University of Kansas: Center for Research Learning

Eysenck, M. W., and Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: the processing efficiency theory. Cogn. Emotion 6, 409–434. doi: 10.1080/02699939208409696

Fredricks, J. A., P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris. 2004.“School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research 74 (1): 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059.

French, A. (2018). Academic Writing: Anxiety, Confusion and the Affective Domain: Why Should Subject Lecturers Acknowledge the Social and Emotional Aspects of Writing Development Processes? Journal of Academic Writing, 8(2), 202–211. https://publications.coventry.ac.uk/index.php/joaw/article/view/487

Hallberg, D., & Olsson, U. (2017). Self-regulated learning in students‟ thesis writing. International Journal of Teaching & Education, 5(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.20472/TE.2017.5.1.002

Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2019). Academic emotions in written corrective feedback situations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.003

Hilgard, E. R., Atkinson, R. C., & Atkinson, R. L. (1979). Introduction to psychology. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. A. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x

Huerta, M., Goodson, P., Beigi, M., & Chlup, D. (2017). Graduate students as academic writers: writing anxiety, self-efficacy and emotional intelligence. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(4), 716–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1238881

Jabali, O. (2018). Students’ attitudes towards EFL university writing: A case study at An-Najah National University, Palestine. Heliyon, 4(11), e00896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00896

Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S., Masia, B.B. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David McKay Co., Inc.

Mbato, C. L., & Cendra, A. (2019). EFL undergraduate students self-regulation in thesis writing. In JELE (Journal of English Language and Education) (Vol. 5, Issue 1, pp. 66–82).

McCann, E. J., & Garcia, T. (1999). Maintaining motivation and regulating emotion: Measuring individual differences in academic volitional strategies *. Learning and Individual Differences, 11(3), 259–279.

Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315-341.

Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91-105

Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), The handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259-282). New York: Springer.

Philippe, Frederick L., Robert J. Vallerand, Nathalie Houlfort, Geneviève L. Lavigne, and Eric G. Donahue. 2010. “Passion for an Activity and Quality of Interpersonal Relationships: The Mediating Role of Emotions.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98 (6): 917–932.

Rahayu, E. Y., and M. Moesarofah. 2022. “The Solutions of Writing Undergraduate Thesis : A Narrative Inquiry Case Study.” Linguistics and English Language Teaching Journal 10(2):57–65.

Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). “Should I ask for help?” The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents‟ help seeking in math class. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 329– 341. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.89.2.329

Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9, 185–211. doi:10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG

Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., & Dornheim, L. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 167–177.

Soini, T., K. Pyhältö, and J. Pietarinen. 2010. “Pedagogical Well-Being: Reflecting Learning and Well-Being in Teachers’ Work.” Teaching and Teachers: Theory and Practice 16: 735–751.

Strain, Amber Chauncey, Roger Azevedo, and Sidney K. D’Mello. 2013. “Using a False Biofeedback Methodology to Explore Relationships between Learners” Affect, Metacognition, and Performance.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 38 (1): 22–39.

Tsiriotakis, I. K., Vassilaki, E., Spantidakis, I., & Stavrou, N. A. M. (2017). The examination of the effects of writing strategy-based procedural facilitative environments on students’ English foreign language writing anxiety levels. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(JAN). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02074

Wagener, B. (2017). The importance of affects, self-regulation and relationships in the writing of a master’s thesis. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1379480

Watson, David, Lee A. Clark, and Auke Tellegen. 1988. “Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (6): 1063–1070.

Xia, W., & Luxin, Y. (2012). Problems and strategies in learning to write a thesis proposal: A study of six M.A. students in a TEFL rogram. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 324– 341. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2012-0024

Yu, S., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Y., Yuan, K., & Zhang, L. (2019). Understanding student engagement with peer feedback on master’s theses: a Macau study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1467879

Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fullfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of examplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1–19). New York: The Guilford Press.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing class

attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845–862.

Published

02-02-2023

How to Cite

Moesarofah, M., & Rahayu, E. Y. (2023). Emotional Engagement in Undergraduate Thesis Writing: Systematic Review . Buana Pendidikan: Jurnal Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Unipa Surabaya, 19(1), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.36456/bp.vol19.no1.a6823