Here are the deal and ethical standards for all parties involved in scientific publications, such as editor, reviewer, and author.


Pancasona editor who is responsible for making decisions on the manuscript to be published in Pancasona. Editors may be guided at the discretion of the editorial board and limited by applicable legal requirements regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor can assist other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair game

Editors will display manuscripts according to intellectual content regardless of race, gender, orientation, religion, ethnicity, nationality, or political philosophy of the author.


Editors and editorial staff may not provide any information about submitted manuscripts to other persons concerned, authors, reviewers, prospective reviewers, other editorials, and publishers, as applicable.


Contribution to Editorial Decisions

The review process can assist the auditor in making editorial decisions and through communication between the editor and the author will assist the author in improving the manuscript.


Any shortlist who feels they are not qualified to review the community service reported in a work or knows that it is not immediately necessary, should notify the editor and possibly themselves from the process.


Any manuscript that has been accepted for review must be treated as a confidential document. Manuscripts may not be shown or discussed with others except with the permission of the editor.

Objectivity Standard

The review must be carried out objectively. Personal criticism of the author is not allowed. The reviewer must clearly show the results of the assessment and the supporting arguments.

Source Acknowledgment

Reviewers should identify relevant published works that have not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported must be accompanied by a relevant citation. The reviewer should also call the editor's attention any substantial similarities or overlaps between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers that are notified personally.

Conflict of interest

Material not found in the manuscript cannot be used for own community service without written permission from the author. Specific information and ideas obtained through a process that must be kept confidential and not used for personal use. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts that have a conflict of interest due to competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with one of the authors, or the company involved with the manuscript.


Reporting Standard

Writers of reports on indigenous community service results must present an accurate report on the work done as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The main data to be represented accurately in the manuscript. Manuscripts should contain enough detail and references to allow others to do community service again. deceptive or intentionally inaccurate statements are ethical and unacceptable behavior.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are required to provide raw data related to the text in order to provide an editorial process and should be prepared to provide public access to such data, where possible, and in any case should be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

Authors must ensure that they have written entirely original work, and if the author has used the work and/or words of others, this is properly cited or cited.

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publications

An author may not, in general, publish a manuscript describing essentially the same community service as one major journal or publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal at the same time constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgments Source

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others should always be given. Authors should cite publications that were influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Paper Writing

Authorship should be limited to concepts that have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, conduct, or interpretation of the reported study. Everyone who has made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who participate in certain substantive aspects of community service activities, they must be recognized or registered as contributors. Correspondence authors must ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no co-authors are excluded from the paper, and that all co-authors have approved and approved the final version of the paper and have submitted a proposal for publication.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

All authors must disclose in their manuscript any other substantive or conflict of interest that might affect the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project must be.

fundamental error in published works

When an author discovers significant errors or inaccuracies in a published book, it is the author's obligation to immediately notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.


Papers published in Pancasona will be considered for retraction in publication if:

They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of errors (e.g. fabrication data) or error errors (e.g. calculation errors or experimental errors).

findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper cross-reference, permission or justification (i.e. case of over-publication)

that includes plagiarism

it reports unethical community service

Mechanism of Following Following Guidelines for Revocation of Publication Ethics Committee (COPE) which can be accessed here.