AStudy on Customer Acceptability of Online Payment Systems in IndonesiaAbstract views: 100
Keywords:perceived utility, perceived ease of use, attitude toward usage, behavioural intention, and mobile banking
The finance industry is increasingly promoting innovation as a means of growth. It is thought to have created advancements that make transactions easier for users through the mobile banking function. The customer's adoption is also aided by several internal elements at the customer's disposal. This is a quantitative study in Indonesia to determine the link between perceived helpful factors, perceived ease of use, attitude toward usage, and behavioural intention. The data analysis approach used in this study is SEM-PLS. For example, consumer attitude and behaviour, the attitude variable in mobile banking may streamline the transaction process, feels enjoyable, and is easy to use, whereas the online payment application feels simple and ensures its anonymity. Users will find it simple to use the program for online payments, transactions will be secure, and payments for online shops will be considerably more manageable.
Y. W. Arthana and N. Rukhviyanti, “PENGARUH MINAT INDIVIDU TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN MOBILE BANKING (M-BANKING): MODEL KOMBINASI TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) DAN THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR (TPB),” J. Inf., vol. VII, no. 1, pp. 25–44, 2015.
G. Prawiramulia, “PENGARUH KUALITAS MOBILE BANKING TERHADAP KEPUASAN NASABAH BANK MANDIRI ( Studi pada Pengguna Mandiri Mobile di Kota Bandung ) THE INFLUENCE OF MOBILE BANKING QUALITY ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF BANK MANDIRI ( A Study on Mandiri Mobile Users in Bandung Ci,” pp. 1–8, 2014.
A. Facchetti, A. Rangone, F. Maria Renga, and A. Savoldelli, “Mobile marketing: an analysis of key success factors and the European value chain,” Int. J. Manag. Decis. Mak., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 65–80, 2005, doi: 10.1504/IJMDM.2005.005966.
A. Kumar, S. Dhingra, V. Batra, and H. Purohit, “A Framework of Mobile Banking Adoption in India,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 6, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.3390/JOITMC6020040.
H. Nysveen, P. E. Pedersen, and S. E. R. Skard, “A review of mobile services research: Research gaps and suggestions for future research on mobile apps. SNF Working Paper No 01/15,” pp. 1–74, 2015.
A. Hidayat, T. Wijaya, A. Ishak, and P. Endi Catyanadika, “Consumer trust as the antecedent of online consumer purchase decision,” Inf., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: 10.3390/info12040145.
W. Widayat, I. Masudin, and N. R. Satiti, “E-Money payment: Customers’ adopting factors and the implication for open innovation,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 6, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.3390/JOITMC6030057.
K. Gbongli, Y. Xu, and K. M. Amedjonekou, “Extended technology acceptance model to predict mobile-based money acceptance and sustainability: A multi-analytical structural equation modeling and neural network approach,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 13, pp. 1–33, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11133639.
R. G. Netemeyer et al., “Developing and validating measures of facets of customer-based brand equity,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 2963, no. February, pp. 209–224, 2004, doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00303-4.
A. Daragmeh, J. Sági, and Z. Zéman, “Continuous intention to use e-wallet in the context of the covid-19 pandemic: Integrating the health belief model (hbm) and technology continuous theory (tct),” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 7, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.3390/joitmc7020132.
F. Mohammad Ebrahimzadeh Sepasgozar, U. Ramzani, S. Ebrahimzadeh, S. Sargolzae, and S. Sepasgozar, “Technology Acceptance in e-Governance: A Case of a Finance Organization,” J. Risk Financ. Manag., vol. 13, no. 7, p. 138, 2020, doi: 10.3390/jrfm13070138.
B. Yue, G. Sheng, S. She, and J. Xu, “Impact of consumer environmental responsibility on green consumption behavior in China: The role of environmental concern and price sensitivity,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12052074.