Quality Matrix-Based Product Innovation in  Birkinpet Pet Harness Apparel

Lusi Zafriana; Anita Hakim Nasution; Prihono .

doi:10.36456/tibuana.7.2.9294.117-129

Authors

Lusi Zafriana Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur
Anita Hakim Nasution Telkom University
Prihono . Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36456/tibuana.7.2.9294.117-129

Keywords:

Pet Harness Apparel ; Product Innovation ; Quality Function Deployment

Abstract

This study employs the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) method to develop BirkinPet pet harness apparel, focusing on customer needs and competitive advantages. A House of Quality (HoQ) matrix was constructed using responses from 96 participants, evaluating the relationship between Customer Importance and Technical Importance to identify key technical priorities for immediate implementation in BirkinPet’s production process. The primary HoQ matrix results indicate that lightweight, comfort, and safety (481.5), design for various activities (416.1), and ergonomic and comfortable design (389.9) are the most important attributes to customers. The main technical priorities include ensuring the product is safe and strong (4.99) and providing a variety of sizes and options (4.86). The novelty lies in the comprehensive and structured application of QFD, emphasizing innovation in designing products that align with current market trends and customer preferences. By integrating comfort, safety, and flexible design, BirkinPet successfully creates a high-quality product that meets customer needs, enhancing customer satisfaction and loyalty while strengthening its competitive position in the pet accessories market.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Deeds, D., DeCarolis, D., & Coombs, J. (2000). DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT IN HIGH TECHNOLOGY VENTURES: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY FIRMS. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 211-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00013-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00013-5

Chan, L., & Wu, M. (2002). Quality function deployment: A literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 143, 463-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00178-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00178-9

Erdil, N., & Arani, O. (2019). Quality function deployment: more than a design tool. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-02-2018-0008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-02-2018-0008

Bossert, J. (2021). Quality Function Deployment. . https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003066545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003066545

Chan, L., Kao, H., & Wu, M. (1999). Rating the importance of customer needs in quality function deployment by fuzzy and entropy methods. International Journal of Production Research, 37, 2499-2518. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075499190635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/002075499190635

Hauser, J., Griffin, A., Klein, R., Katz, G., & Gaskin, S. (2010). Quality Function Deployment (QFD). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444316568.WIEM05023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444316568.wiem05023

Kwong, C., & Bai, H. (2002). A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 13, 367-377. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019984626631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019984626631

Grainger, J., Wills, A., & Montrose, V. (2016). The behavioral effects of walking on a collar and harness in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research, 14, 60-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVEB.2016.06.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2016.06.002

Kim, J., Kweon, S., & Choi, J. (2007). A Study on the Purchasing Practices of Pet Dog’s Apparel. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 31, 189-196. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2007.31.2.189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2007.31.2.189

Pálya, Z., Rácz, K., Nagymáté, G., & Kiss, R. M. (2022). Development of a detailed canine gait analysis method for evaluating harnesses: A pilot study. Plos one, 17(3), e0264299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264299

Bläske, A., Schwarzer, A., Ebner, M. V., Gerbig, H., Reese, S., Erhard, M., & Wöhr, A. C. (2022). Evaluation of small mammal pet supplies offered in German retail under animal welfare aspects. Plos one, 17(2), e0262658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262658

González, S. M., de León, C. V. C., & Castillo, E. A. R. (2023). Continuous improvement of a face protection mask using quality function deployment. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia: RVG, 28(10), 1280-1297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.28.e10.25

Huang, J., Mao, L., Liu, H., & Song, M. (2021). Quality function deployment improvement: A bibliometric analysis and literature review. Quality & Quantity, 56, 1347-1366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01179-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01179-7

Delgado‐Hernandez, D. J., Bampton, K. E., & Aspinwall, E. (2007). Quality function deployment in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 25(6), 597-609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190601139917

Xu, J., & Xia, C. (2023). Application of Quality Function Deployment and Theory of Inventive Problem Solving in the Human-pet Shared Furniture Design Process. 2023 International Conference on Culture-Oriented Science and Technology (CoST), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.1109/CoST60524.2023.00022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CoST60524.2023.00022

Mincolelli, G., Giacobone, G., Marchi, M., & Imbesi, S. (2020). New Collaborative Version of the Quality Function Deployment: Practical Application to the HABITAT Project. , 823-828. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39512-4_125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39512-4_125

Cardoso, J., Filho, N., & Miguel, P. (2015). Application of Quality Function Deployment for the development of an organic product. Food Quality and Preference, 40, 180-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODQUAL.2014.09.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.09.012

Ping, Y., Liu, R., Lin, W., & Liu, H. (2020). A new integrated approach for engineering characteristic prioritization in quality function deployment. Adv. Eng. Informatics, 45, 101099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101099

Song, C., Wang, J., & Li, J. (2020). New Framework for Quality Function Deployment Using Linguistic Z-Numbers. Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8020224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math8020224

Fang, H., Li, J., & Song, W. (2020). A New Method for Quality Function Deployment Based on Rough Cloud Model Theory. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, PP, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.3020339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.3020339

Sukma, D., Stiawan, I., Kurnia, H., & Purba, H. (2022). Quality Function Deployment in Healthcare: Systematic Literature Review. Spektrum Industri. https://doi.org/10.12928/si.v20i2.62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/si.v20i2.62

Efe, B., Yerlikaya, M., & Efe, Ö. (2020). Mobile phone selection based on a novel quality function deployment approach. Soft Computing, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04876-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04876-x

Susanto, R., & Andriana, A. (2020). Product Development Analysis using Quality Function Deployment. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 879. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/879/1/012038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/879/1/012038

Ginting, R., Ishak, A., Malik, A., & Satrio, M. (2020). Product Development with Quality Function Deployment (QFD) : A Literature Review. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1003/1/012022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1003/1/012022

García-Orozco, S., Vargas-Gutiérrez, G., Ordóñez-Sánchez, S., & Silva, R. (2023). Using multi-criteria decision making in quality function deployment for offshore renewable energies. Energies, 16(18), 6533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186533