Universal Design for Learning: Perspektif Guru Pendidikan Jasamani di Sekolah Inklusi

Authors

  • Yandika Fefrian Rosmi Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
  • Muhammad Nurrohman Jauhari Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36456/j-stand.v4i2.9605

Keywords:

Universal Design for Learning, Pendidikan Jasmani, Sekolah Inklusi

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi perspektif guru Pendidikan Jasmani di sekolah inklusi terkait penerapan Universal Design for Learning (UDL) dalam kegiatan pembelajaran. UDL adalah pendekatan pendidikan yang fleksibel dan responsif terhadap kebutuhan semua siswa, termasuk siswa dengan kebutuhan khusus. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian survei dengan menggunakan non-structural questionnaire. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Universal design for learining memilki dampak yang positif baik yang dirasakan oleh guru maupun oleh siswa di ataranya adalah guru Pendidikan jasmnai adaptif menyukai pendekatan Universal design for learning, pendekatan Universal design for learning memiliki dapak positif yaitu peningkatan nilai dan interaktif dan aktifnya siswa baik dengan guru maupun dengan teman dan guru akan selalu menerapkan pendekatan universal design for learning pada pembelajaran Pendidikan jasmani adaptif

References

Chow, W. S. E., de Bruin, K., & Sharma, U. (2023). A scoping review of perceived support needs of teachers for implementing inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1-20.

Griful-Freixenet, J., Struyven, K., Vantieghem, W., & Gheyssens, E. (2020). Exploring the interrelationship between Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and Differentiated Instruction (DI): A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 29, 100306

Griful-Freixenet, J., Struyven, K., & Vantieghem, W. (2021). Toward more inclusive education: an empirical test of the universal design for learning conceptual model among preservice teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(3), 381-395.

Johnson, E., & Kapalu, M. K. (2019). Inclusive education: implementing universal design for learning. Marvel publishers.

Katz, J., & Sokal, L. (2016). Universal design for learning as a bridge to inclusion: A qualitative report of student voices. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 12(2), 36-63.

Kieran, L., & Anderson, C. (2019). Connecting universal design for learning with culturally responsive teaching. Education and Urban Society, 51(9), 1202-1216.

Kurtts Ph D, S. A. (2006). Universal design for learning in inclusive classrooms. Electronic Journal for Inclusive Education, 1(10), 7.

Messinger-Willman, J., & Marino, M. T. (2010). Universal design for learning and assistive technology: Leadership considerations for promoting inclusive education in today’s secondary schools. Nassp Bulletin, 94(1), 5-16.

Rapp, A. C., & Corral-Granados, A. (2024). Understanding inclusive education–a theoretical contribution from system theory and the constructionist perspective. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(4), 423-439.

Roski, M., Sebastian, R., Ewerth, R., Hoppe, A., & Nehring, A. (2024). Learning analytics and the Universal Design for Learning (UDL): A clustering approach. Computers & Education, 214, 105028.

Scott, L. A. (2018). Barriers with implementing a universal design for learning framework. Inclusion, 6(4), 274-286.

Spencer, S. A. (2011). Universal Design for Learning: Assistance for Teachers in Today's Inclusive Classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 10-22.

Winnick, J. P., & Porretta, D. L. (2016). Adapted physical education and sport. Human Kinetics.

Wu, X. (2010). Universal Design for Learning: A Collaborative Framework for Designing Inclusive Curriculum. ie: inquiry in education, 1(2), n2.

Yun, J., & Beamer, J. (2018). Promoting physical activity in adapted physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 89(4), 7-13.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-30

How to Cite

Universal Design for Learning: Perspektif Guru Pendidikan Jasamani di Sekolah Inklusi. (2023). STAND : Journal Sports Teaching and Development, 4(2), 128-135. https://doi.org/10.36456/j-stand.v4i2.9605