Effect of 3D Printing Parameters on Dimensional Accuracy Using the Taguchi and Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36456/tibuana.8.2.10552

Keywords:

3D Printing, RSM Method, Taguchi Method, Dimensional Accuracy

Abstract

Advances in technology in the manufacturing industry have driven the use of 3D printing as a fast and efficient prototyping solution. This study aims to optimize the process parameters of FDM 3D printing using PLA+ material with ASTM D-638-04 type specimens. The process parameters tested include printing speed, nozzle temperature, layer thickness, infill rate, and bed temperature, each at three levels. Optimization was performed using the Taguchi method and Response Surface Methodology (RSM), with a focus on dimensional accuracy (length, width, and thickness) as the primary response. The optimal parameters obtained from the Taguchi method are printing speed of 45 mm/s, nozzle temperature of 240°C, layer thickness of 0.30 mm, infill rate of 100%, and bed temperature of 55°C. Meanwhile, the RSM method yielded the following optimal parameters printing speed of 50 mm/s, nozzle temperature of 240°C, layer thickness of 0.30 mm, infill rate of 100%, and bed temperature of 60.65°C

References

[1] M. Xu, J. M. David, and S. H. Kim, “The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Opportunities and Challenges,” International Journal of Financial Research, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 90, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.5430/ijfr.v9n2p90.

[2] A. Gilchrist, “Introducing Industry 4.0,” in Industry 4.0, Berkeley, CA: Apress, 2016, pp. 195–215. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4842-2047-4_13.

[3] I. Karabegović, R. Turmanidze, and P. Dašić, “Robotics and Automation as a Foundation of the Fourth Industrial Revolution - Industry 4.0,” 2020, pp. 128–136. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-40724-7_13.

[4] P. KUMAR, “Transforming Operations: A Comprehensive Analysis of Industry 4.0 Technologies in Operations Management,” INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, vol. 08, no. 05, pp. 1–5, May 2024, doi: 10.55041/IJSREM32416.

[5] F. Edverton, “Digitalization in manufacturing and industry 4.0,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2024, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4723314.

[6] N. Alsaadi, “Modeling and Analysis of Industry 4.0 Adoption Challenges in the Manufacturing Industry,” Processes, vol. 10, no. 10, p. 2150, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.3390/pr10102150.

[7] B. Bajic, A. Rikalovic, N. Suzic, and V. Piuri, “Industry 4.0 Implementation Challenges and Opportunities: A Managerial Perspective,” IEEE Syst J, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 546–559, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2020.3023041.

[8] J. Huang, Q. Qin, and J. Wang, “A Review of Stereolithography: Processes and Systems,” Processes, vol. 8, no. 9, p. 1138, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.3390/pr8091138.

[9] R. C, R. Shanmugam, M. Ramoni, and G. BK, “A review on additive manufacturing for aerospace application,” Mater Res Express, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 022001, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/ad21ad.

[10] M. Khorasani, A. Ghasemi, B. Rolfe, and I. Gibson, “Additive manufacturing a powerful tool for the aerospace industry,” Rapid Prototyp J, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 87–100, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1108/RPJ-01-2021-0009.

[11] M. H. Mobarak et al., “Recent advances of additive manufacturing in implant fabrication – A review,” Applied Surface Science Advances, vol. 18, p. 100462, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.apsadv.2023.100462.

[12] D. Helena, A. Ramos, T. Varum, and J. N. Matos, “Antenna Design Using Modern Additive Manufacturing Technology: A Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 177064–177083, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3027383.

[13] M. W. Rosyadi, A. D. Prayoga, A. S. Mukti, R. D. K. Mahameru, and W. D. Lestari, “Optimization of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Machine Process Parameters for Polylactic Acid (PLA) Surface Roughness Using the Taguchi Approach,” Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Science, and Innovation, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 35–44, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.31284/j.jmesi.2024.v4i1.5999.

[14] F. K. A. Nugraha and B. B. Wahyujati, “Optimasi Parameter 3D Printing Menggunakan Material PP Daur Ulang pada Spesimen ASTM 638 D 10 type 1 dengan Response Surface Method,” J Teknol, pp. 82–87, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.35134/jitekin.v12i2.78.

[15] A. Cano-Vicent et al., “Fused deposition modelling: Current status, methodology, applications and future prospects,” Addit Manuf, vol. 47, p. 102378, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102378.

[16] M. Hussain, S. M. Khan, M. Shafiq, and N. Abbas, “A review on PLA-based biodegradable materials for biomedical applications,” Giant, vol. 18, p. 100261, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.giant.2024.100261.

[17] C. R. Multari and R. A. Pearson, “Multifunctional particle additives for simultaneous enhancement of toughness and biodegradation of poly(lactic acid),” Polymer (Guildf), vol. 308, p. 127235, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2024.127235.

[18] H. Alenezi, Z. Haidar, and M. Das, “Optimization of Parameters Using Taguchi Orthogonal Array Design for an Intensified Per-Pass Conversion of Alphabutol® Technology in Butene-1 Production,” International Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 2022, pp. 1–6, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/1699196.

[19] A. M. George and A. R. Tembhurkar, “Taguchi L16 orthogonal array approach for optimization of fluoride removal from aqueous solution using Saccharum spontaneum weed grass novel biosorbent,” Sustain Chem Pharm, vol. 30, p. 100833, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.scp.2022.100833.

[20] S. D. A, “Response Surface Methodology-A Statistical Tool for the Optimization of Responses,” Glob J Addict Rehabil Med, vol. 7, no. 1, May 2023, doi: 10.19080/GJARM.2023.07.555705.

[21] L. A. Sarabia and M. C. Ortiz, “Response Surface Methodology,” in Comprehensive Chemometrics, Elsevier, 2009, pp. 345–390. doi: 10.1016/B978-044452701-1.00083-1.

[22] Dr. K. M. J. Rashid, “Optimize the Taguchi method, the signal-to-noise ratio, and the sensitivity,” International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 64–70, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.22271/maths.2023.v8.i6a.1406.

[23] A. Mitra, “The Taguchi method,” WIREs Computational Statistics, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 472–480, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1002/wics.169.

[24] M. Perzyk, R. Biernacki, and J. Kozlowski, “Data mining in manufacturing: Significance analysis of process parameters,” Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf, vol. 222, no. 11, pp. 1503–1516, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1243/09544054JEM1182.

[25] C.-P. Fung and Y.-F. Tien, “Study of Multiresponse Optimization for Fiber-reinforced Poly(Butylene Terephthalate),” Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 923–933, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1177/0731684405045018.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Effect of 3D Printing Parameters on Dimensional Accuracy Using the Taguchi and Response Surface Methodology (RSM). (2026). Tibuana : Journal of Applied Industrial Engineering, 8(2), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.36456/tibuana.8.2.10552