Evaluation of Measurement Instruments Using Fuzzy FMEA and MSA/GRR for Determining Calibration Intervals

Vinanda Asti Ningrum; Bambang Syairudin

doi:10.36456/tibuana.9.02.11482

Authors

Vinanda Asti Ningrum Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya
Bambang Syairudin Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36456/tibuana.9.02.11482

Keywords:

Calibration Interval Evaluation, Fuzzy Failure Mode and Effects Analysis, Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility, Measurement System Analysis

Abstract

Laboratory testing instruments are critical for ensuring accurate measurement results and maintaining product quality. Failures or performance decline in these instruments may affect testing reliability. This study evaluates potential instrument failures using Fuzzy Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (Fuzzy FMEA) and assesses measurement system capability via Measurement System Analysis (MSA) with Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility (GRR). Five instruments Thickness Gauge, Roughness Tester, Tensile Tester, Density Tester, and Chromium Analyzer were analyzed. Fuzzy FMEA results show the Roughness Tester has the highest Fuzzy Risk Priority Number (FRPN = 8.93), followed by the Chromium Analyzer (8.20), Tensile Tester (6.40), Thickness Gauge (5.47), and Density Tester (3.33). Historical data validate that higher FRPN values correspond to more frequent operational failures. GRR analysis indicates all instruments maintain acceptable measurement system performance (%GRR < 30%). Based on these findings, calibration intervals are recommended according to risk level and system stability, promoting efficient calibration management and reliable testing results.

References

Wu, X., & Wu, J. (2021). The risk priority number evaluation of FMEA analysis based on random uncertainty and fuzzy uncertainty. Complexity, 2021, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8817667

Pacana, A. (2018). Supervision of measuring equipment based on risk management and ISO 9001. Production Engineering Archives, 21, 8–11. https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2018.21.02

Sundkvist, H. (2024). Calibration interval optimization. Chalmers University of Technology

Relyence Corporation. (2020). An overview of reliability analysis tools and techniques. Relyence Corporation

Montgomery, D. C. (2019). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (8th ed.). Wiley.

JCGM. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM).

ISO. (2015). ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems — Requirements.

ISO. (2017). ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.

AIAG. (2010). Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA) Manual (4th ed.).

Jiang, X., & Wang, H. (2012). Optimization of calibration intervals based on reliability analysis. Measurement.

Liu, H. C., Liu, L., & Liu, N. (2013). Risk evaluation approaches in FMEA: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications.

Kumru, M., & Kumru, P. Y. (2013). Fuzzy FMEA application. Applied Soft Computing.

Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control.

Kahraman, C., et al. (2004). Fuzzy FMEA application. Reliability Engineering & System Safety.

Korchynska, O.-S., & Hut, T. (2022). Metrological risks in management system of product quality at the manufacturing stage. Measuring Equipment and Metrology, 83(1), 30–34. https://doi.org/0.23939/istcmtm

Senvar, O., & Firat, S. U. O. (2010). An overview of capability evaluation of measurement systems and gauge repeatability and reproducibility studies. International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, 1, 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2010022

Osama, M., & Shash, A. Y. (2023). Assessment of risks for physical calibration labs. In A. Öchsner & H. Altenbach (Eds.), Engineering design applications V, Advanced structured materials (Vol. 171, pp. 401–429). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26466-5_26

Toteva, P., Slavov, S., & Vasileva, D. (2017). Comparison of the methods for determination of calibration and verification intervals of measuring devices. MATEC Web of Conferences, 94, 04012. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20179404012

Fries, D. S., & Guthrie, W. (2021). An examination of measurement decision risk and other measurement quality metrics. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 126, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.126.008