Integrated ABC–VED–AHP Framework for Prioritizing Returned Materials in Electricity Transmission Warehouse Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36456/tibuana.9.02.11512Keywords:
AHP; electricity transmission warehouse; returned material; VED analysisAbstract
Returned materials in electricity transmission warehouses represent ex-operational assets that may still contain economic value and operational utility. However, their accumulation can reduce warehouse efficiency, increase storage burden, and delay asset recovery decisions. In PT PLN (Persero) transmission warehouses, warehouse capacity utilization reached an average of 93.29%, exceeding the recommended operational threshold, with several warehouses experiencing overcapacity conditions. Existing classification practices remain administrative and do not provide a systematic basis for determining whether materials should be retained, repaired, reused, transferred, or disposed of. This study proposes an integrated multi-criteria decision framework for prioritizing returned materials by combining ABC analysis, VED analysis, physical condition assessment, reuse potential evaluation, and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The framework was applied to 580 returned material items with a total replacement value of IDR 256,057,003,073. The AHP results show that operational criticality is the most influential criterion with a weight of 0.5342, followed by physical condition, economic value, and reuse potential. The consistency ratio was 0.0455, indicating consistent expert judgment. The final prioritization classified 397 items as high priority, 116 items as medium priority, and 67 items as low priority. The proposed framework supports more objective, transparent, and data-driven decision-making in returned material management and contributes to warehouse space optimization, dead stock reduction, and asset recovery improvement in electricity infrastructure systems.
References
[1] M. Alkahtani, A. Ziout, and M. Olayan, “An insight into reverse logistics with a focus on collection systems,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–19, 2021.
[2] P. Becerra, J. Mula, and R. Sanchis, “Green supply chain quantitative models for sustainable inventory management: A review,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 328, p. 129544, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129544.
[3] M. Bevilacqua and M. Braglia, “The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 239–249, 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(99)00047-8.
[4] R. Botter and L. Fortuin, “Stocking strategy for service parts: A case study,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 656–674, 2000.
[5] S. Chopra and P. Meindl, Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation, 7th ed. Pearson Education, 2021.
[6] K. Govindan, H. Soleimani, and D. Kannan, “Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 240, no. 3, pp. 603–626, 2015.
[7] A. Hadi-Vencheh and A. Mohamadghasemi, “A fuzzy AHP-DEA approach for multiple criteria ABC inventory classification,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 3346–3352, 2011.
[8] M. A. Millstein, L. Yang, and H. Li, “Optimizing ABC inventory grouping decisions,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 148, pp. 71–80, 2014.
[9] PT PLN (Persero), Internal Warehouse Capacity Report of Transmission Implementation Units, PT PLN (Persero) Unit Induk Transmisi Jawa Bagian Barat, unpublished internal document, 2025.
[10] PT PLN (Persero), Material Return and Warehouse Inventory (MRWI) Implementation Guideline, unpublished internal document, 2024.
[11] R. Ramanathan, “ABC inventory classification with multiple-criteria using weighted linear optimization,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 695–700, 2006.
[12] D. S. Rogers and R. S. Tibben-Lembke, Going Backwards: Reverse Logistics Trends and Practices. Reverse Logistics Executive Council, 2001.
[13] T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
[14] T. L. Saaty, “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process,” International Journal of Services Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 83–98, 2008.
[15] P. L. Yu, Multiple-Criteria Decision Making: Concepts, Techniques, and Extensions. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2011.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tibuana : Journal of Applied Industrial Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












