PENERAPAN PENDEKATAN PROBLEM POSING PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DI KELAS VIII A SMPN 2 TAMAN

Authors

  • Anna Wahyu Hidayah SMP Negeri 2 Taman Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36456/buanamatematika.v6i2:.360

Abstract

This research in the wake of the fact it can be said that the rapid technological development wasbased on the development of mathematics, math has been taught right from kindergarten up of a higher level.To print a future thinker with math experts needed for effective learning and efficientso that teachers should be able to select appropriate learning for students. formulation of the problem in this research is” how completeness of student learning outcomes, level of creative thinking abilitiesand the students' response to learning Problem Posing?” the purpose of this study was to describeclassically completeness of student learning outcome, level of creative thinking abilitiesand the students, and the response given students after learning Problem Posing.In this study to measure student mastery gained from achievement test(THB), to determine the level of students' creative thinking abilities(TKBKS) taken from the test results correlated learningwith components of creative thinkingthat is fluency, flexibility, originility, dan elaborationand to evaluate the response of the students was obtained from questionnaires source data from this study is the class VIII A SMPN 2 Taman. Data obtained from this study are as followsz: from the results THB stated that in the classical completeness of85,29 %,as much as 67 % students occupied TKBKS levelfour (very creative) and the students' response to the statement of learning Problem Posing have an average maximum of 3,51that is " I feel Problem Posing learning model is useful for learning mathematics”. From the above it can be concluded that the study results in the classical mastery learning Students Creative Thinking Ability level the student is able to be in a position TKBS 4 ( very creative ) , students can be said to be a positive response.

Keywords: Creative thinking, level of creative thinking, fluency, flexibility, originility, elaboration, Problem Posing


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur Penenlitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik.Jogyakarta: RinekaCipta

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2013. Prosedur Penenlitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Dimayati dan Mudjono. 2006. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

DPN.2005. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia EdidiKetiga. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Mulyasa. 2013. Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung. PT Remaja Rosda karya

NgalimPurwanto. 2010. Prinsip – PrinsipdanTeknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung. PT RemajaRosdakarya.

Nurhaini D dkk.2008. Matematika Konsepdan Aplikasinya. Jakarta. JawaPos Group

Sagala, Syaiful. 2010.  Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung:  Alfabeta.

Siswono, T.Y.E. 199. 2007. Penjenjangan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Identifikasi Prosess Berfikir Kreatif Siswa Dalam Memecahkan dan Mengajukan Masalah Mataematika. Desertasi.Tidak di publikasikan. Surabaya: Pascasarjana Unesa.

Sudjana Nana. 2011. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung. PT RemajaRosdakarya.

Sudjana. 2005. MetodeStatistik. Bandung. PT. Taristo Bandung.

Susanto Ahmad. 2013. Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta. Kencana Pernada Media Grup.

Thobroni, M. 2015. Belajar dan Pembelajaran Teori dan Praktik. Yogyakarta: Ar – Ruzz Media.

Trianto. 2007. Model – Model Pembelajaran Inovatif – Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana

Uno B. Hamzah. 2006. Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Gorontal:Bumiaksara

Yamin Martinis. 2013. Setrategi dan metode Dalam Pembelajaran. Jambi.Refrensi (GP Press).

Published

26-12-2016

Issue

Section

Artikel

How to Cite

PENERAPAN PENDEKATAN PROBLEM POSING PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DI KELAS VIII A SMPN 2 TAMAN. (2016). Buana Matematika : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.36456/buanamatematika.v6i2:.360