Studi Penelusuran (Tracer Study) Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Tahun Lulus 2015-2019

Authors

  • Sukamto Universitas PGRI Semarang
  • Ervina Eka Subekti Universitas PGRI Semarang
  • Fajar Cahyadi Universitas PGRI Semarang
  • Wawan Priyanto Universitas PGRI Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36456/inventa.5.2.a4322

Keywords:

tracer study, graduate

Abstract

A tracer study is a study conducted to determine the level of market absorption of graduates, the number of graduate unemployed, the suitability of subject matter to field needs, and the need for curriculum revision or renewal. The Primary School Teacher Education Program (PGSD) study program requires data for this purpose. Among them are graduates who work in the formal sector (teachers, lecturers, administrative staff, employees in business and industry, etc.) and in the informal sector. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the extent of the absorption rate of PGSD S1 alumni in the job market. (2) Knowing the percentage of alumni waiting period before getting a job. (3) Obtaining data about the suitability of the ongoing curriculum with field needs. The results of this tracing study indicate that the absorption rate of PGSD S1 graduates in the job market is 87.92%. The waiting period for PGSD undergraduate graduates to get a job is 42.10% getting a job before graduating and on average it takes 3 months to get a job. The conformity between the subject matter and the field needs of elementary school teachers was 67.16% alumni. Among them are working as civil servants (government agencies) as teachers, as teachers in private schools. The alumni assessment is seen from several aspects, including: ethics, expertise in the field of science, foreign language skills, communication skills, teamwork, ability to develop themselves and the ability to use information technology. From all aspects the average rating given is good. The highest level of competence mastered by alumni at graduation (85.1%) is the ability to continue learning all the time and the lowest (69.25%) is the ability to speak English. One suggestion that can be put forward is about improving English language skills.

References

Arikunto, S. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Azwar, S. 2007. Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Hernawan, A.H. 2002. Prinsip-prinsip Pengembangan Kurikulum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Lin, N., 1976. Foundations of Social Research. New York: McGraw-Hill

Nasution, S. 2003. Asas-asas Kurikulum. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Nazir, M. 1999. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

SEARCA. 2008. Tracer Study on SEARCA Fellows and UC Grantees. http://aau.org/studyprogram/web/scholarship. 24 Agustus 2008.

Setiawan, B dan Muntaha, A. 2000. Metode Penelitian Komunikasi II. Jakarta: Pusat Penerbitan Universitas Terbuka.

Sudjana, N. 2005. Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Kurikulum di Sekolah. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Zembere, S.N. dan Chinyama, MPM. 2008. The University of Malawi Graduate Tracer Study 1996. http://aau.org/studyprogram/notpub. 24 Agustus 2008.

Published

2021-09-29