Productivity Improvement Knuckle Steering Production Line through the Objective Matrix (OMAX) Method

M Nushron Ali Mukhtar; Prihono; Moch Amaludin  Hermawan

doi:10.36456/tibuana.9.1.11108

Authors

M Nushron Ali Mukhtar Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
Prihono Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
Moch Amaludin Hermawan Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36456/tibuana.9.1.11108

Keywords:

Productivity, Knuckle Steering, Objective Matrix, Foundry Process

Abstract

In the face of market dynamics and increasing demand, the company needs to optimise productivity in every production line, including the knuckle steering item line. This study aims to measure and evaluate productivity using the Objective Matrix (OMAX) method, which integrates several key performance ratios. The analysis results showed that the highest productivity occurred in March 2024 (517.2), while the lowest was in September 2024 (23.6). The lowest ratio was production achievement to machine capacity, contributing only 27 out of a total score of 131. The low productivity is due to the lack of operator competence, suboptimal machine maintenance, long process duration, and the high amount of defective material from the foundry process. These findings emphasise the importance of comprehensive improvements in human resources, machine maintenance, and raw material quality control to drive sustainable productivity improvements.

References

[1] I. W. G. Afianti, E. Z., Satriawan, I. K., & Sedana Yoga, “Analisis Produktivitas Produksi PT. Bapak Bakery Badung Bali.,” J. Rekayasa Dan Manaj. Agroindustri, vol. 1, no. 8, p. 127, 2020.

[2] S. Wahyuni, H. C., & Setiawan, “Implementasi Metode Objective Matrix (OMAX) Untuk Pengukuran Produktivitas Pada PT.ABC,” PROZIMA (Productivity, Optim. Manuf. Syst. Eng., vol. 1, no. 12, 2017.

[3] A. M. MNA Mukhtar, “Pengukuran Dan Analisis Produktifitas Pada Rancang Bangun Kursi Ergonomis Operator Mesin POND,” in Seminar Nasional Hasil Riset dan Pengabdian, 2019, pp. 363–369.

[4] P. Priscilia, “Analisis Produktivitas Kerja Pada PT. Berkat Anugerah Raya,” Agora, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 1–6, 2017.

[5] D. Wibisono, “Analisis Produktivitas Dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Metode Objective Matrix (OMAX) Studi Kasus di PT. XYZ,” J. Optimasi Tek. Ind., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2019.

[6] S. Mundari and R. Firmansyah, “Productivity Measurement to Monitor the Performance of Shrimp Cracker Companies,” vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 397–402, 2023.

[7] B. Supriyanto, A., Probowati, B. D., & Burhan, “Pengukuran Produktivitas Perusahaan Tahu Dengan Metode Objective Matrix (Omax),” Agrointek, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 109–117, 2016.

[8] I. Prakoso, E. Mustakim, and D. N. Saputro, “Productivity Analysis Of Split Stone Production Using Objective Matrix ( Omax ) Method ( A Case Study ),” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 41–48, 2022.

[9] S. Ramayanti, G., Sastraguntara, G., & Supriyadi, “Analisis Produktivitas dengan Metode Objective Matrix (OMAX) di Lantai Produksi Perusahaan Botol Minuman,” J. INTECH Tek. Ind. Univ. Serang Raya, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 31–38, 2020.

[10] M. A. Saryatmo and A. S. Gunawan, “ANALISIS PENGUKURAN KINERJA PERUSAHAAN DENGAN METODE PERFORMANCE PRISM DAN SCORING OBJECTIVE MATRIX ( OMAX ) PADA PT . BPAS,” pp. 61–70.

[11] D. Fitriani, R. Nasution, and N. Sari, “JURIT Jurnal Riset Ilmu Teknik Productivity Analysis on Liquid Nitrogen ( LIN ) and Liquid Oxygen ( LOX ) Production Using Objective Matrix ( OMAX ) Method,” pp. 139–151, 2023, doi: 10.59976/jurit.v1i3.31.

[12] K. L. Gaol, E. Aryanny, and E. Java, “Journal la multiapp,” vol. 06, no. 06, pp. 1640–1655, 2025, doi: 10.37899/journallamultiapp.v6i6.2234.

[13] A. Priyono and W. Java, “Strategies to improve human resource performance at PT XYZ in West Java,” 2023.

[14] D. Ernawati and P. Measurement, “Performance Measurement Analysis of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Using the AHP-Based SCOR Method and OMAX at PT XYZ,” vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 23–34, 2025