The Impact of STEM-Based Physics Worksheets on Students’ Learning Independence and Conceptual Understanding

Authors

  • Nurul Yakina Basri Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Subaer Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Khaeruddin Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36456/bp.vol22.no2.a11234

Keywords:

STEM-Based Learning; Physics Worksheets; Learning Independence; Conceptual Understanding

Abstract

This study examined the effect of STEM-based physics student worksheets on students’ learning independence and conceptual understanding of heat and temperature at SMAN 5 Enrekang. A quasi-experimental non-equivalent control group design was used. The purposive sample comprised 60 students: 30 in the experimental group and 30 in the control group. The experimental group used STEM-based worksheets, whereas the control group used conventional worksheets. Learning independence questionnaires and conceptual-understanding tests were administered before and after the intervention. Descriptive results showed a learning-independence mean of 103.63 (SD = 5.11) for the experimental group and 87.03 (SD = 4.70) for the control group. For conceptual understanding, the experimental-group mean increased from 18.77 to 26.00, whereas the control-group mean increased from 20.00 to 21.00. The experimental group had an N-Gain of 0.71, categorized as high. The Mann–Whitney U test indicated significant between-group differences for both outcomes (p < .001).

Author Biographies

  • Nurul Yakina Basri, Universitas Negeri Makassar

    Nurul Yakina Basri is a Master’s student in Physics Education at Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia.

  • Subaer, Universitas Negeri Makassar

    Subaer is a Professor in Physics Education and Head of the Master’s Program in Physics Education at Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia.

  • Khaeruddin, Universitas Negeri Makassar

    Khaeruddin is a lecturer in Physics Education and serves as the Vice Dean of the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences at Universitas Negeri Makassar. 

References

Anwar, M., Rahman, A., & Sari, D. (2022). The effect of STEM-based learning on students’ critical thinking and physics achievement. Journal of Physics Education Research, 17(2), 145–156.

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

Cao, X., Lu, H., & Wu, Q. (2025). Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of STEM education on students’ learning outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1579474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1579474

Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. (2015). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119

Fitriani, A., Widodo, A., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2023). STEM-based learning and students’ conceptual understanding in physics education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(3), 411–425.

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. Retrieved from http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf

Handayani, L., Kurniati, E., & Prasetyo, Z. (2023). Diagnosing student misconceptions of temperature and heat concepts in secondary schools. Journal of Science Education Research, 9(1), 25–34.

Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K–12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Kazu, I. Y., & Yalçın, C. (2024). A meta-analysis of the impact of STEM education on academic achievement and motivation. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(3), 1–15.

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(11), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

Lestari, N., Widodo, A., & Suryani, D. (2022). Implementation of STEM instructional model in physics: Effects on conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills. Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 6(2), 98–110.

Portillo-Blanco, A., Deprez, H., De Cock, M., Guisasola, J., & Zuza, K. (2024). A systematic literature review of integrated STEM education principles. Education Sciences, 14(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020145

Putri, A., Hasanah, U., & Firmansyah, R. (2021). Students’ conceptual difficulties in heat and temperature: Implications for instructional design. Journal of Physics Learning, 5(3), 75–84.

Rahmawati, R., & Setiawan, W. (2022). STEM-based worksheets to enhance self-regulated learning and concept mastery in physics classes. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 18(1), 44–53.

Suri, I. R. A., Putra, R. W. Y., & Netriwati. (2025). Pengaruh model pembelajaran STEM terhadap pemahaman konsep matematis ditinjau dari gaya belajar. JKPM, 8(1), 55–66.

Susanti, D., Hidayat, T., & Nurhayati, S. (2023). The role of reflective tasks in developing students’ learning independence. Journal of Educational Development, 21(4), 233–245.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Downloads

Published

31-10-2026

Issue

Vol. 22 No. 2 (2026): Buana Pendidikan: Jurnal Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Unipa Surabaya

Section

Research Article

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Nurul Yakina Basri, Subaer, Khaeruddin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

The Impact of STEM-Based Physics Worksheets on Students’ Learning Independence and Conceptual Understanding. (2026). Buana Pendidikan: Jurnal Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Unipa Surabaya, 22(2), 180-188. https://doi.org/10.36456/bp.vol22.no2.a11234