Mendorong Kreativitas Digital: Peran Literasi Koding dalam Pengembangan Teknologi Pembelajaran

Amilia Khasanah Marzuki

doi:10.36456/7k7jg477

Authors

Amilia Khasanah Marzuki Universitas Adi Buana Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36456/7k7jg477

Keywords:

literasi koding, berpikir komputasional, kreativitas digital, teknologi pembelajaran, instructional design

Abstract

Artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis peran literasi koding sebagai kompetensi pedagogis yang mendorong kreativitas digital dalam pengembangan teknologi pembelajaran. Penelitian menggunakan studi literatur naratif dengan sintesis tematik terhadap artikel jurnal terindeks, proceeding akademik, dan dokumen kebijakan yang relevan pada rentang 2020–2025, serta melibatkan karya-karya seminal yang menjadi landasan konseptual. Penelusuran dilakukan menggunakan kata kunci coding literacy, computational thinking, digital creativity, educational technology, dan low-code/no-code, kemudian sumber diseleksi berdasarkan relevansi topik, kredibilitas publikasi, dan keterkaitan dengan konteks pendidikan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa literasi koding berperan pada tiga level. Pertama, memperkuat computational thinking melalui aktivitas dekomposisi, abstraksi, algoritma, debugging, dan evaluasi. Kedua, menjembatani teori konstruktivisme–konstruksionisme dengan praktik desain pembelajaran berbasis proyek, prototyping, dan pengembangan media interaktif. Ketiga, mentransformasi peran pendidik dan teknolog pendidikan dari pengguna teknologi menjadi perancang pengalaman belajar. Kajian juga menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan low-code/no-code berpotensi menurunkan hambatan teknis, tetapi implementasinya tetap memerlukan scaffolding pedagogis, dukungan infrastruktur, dan integrasi kurikulum. Implikasinya, program studi Teknologi Pendidikan dan pengembangan profesional guru perlu menempatkan literasi koding sebagai kompetensi desain, bukan sekadar keterampilan teknis. Dengan demikian, literasi koding layak diposisikan sebagai fondasi pengembangan teknologi pembelajaran yang kreatif, kontekstual, dan berkelanjutan.

References

Ajimati, M. O., Carroll, N., & Maher, M. (2025). Adoption of low-code and no-code development: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Journal of Systems and Software, 222, Article 112300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.112300

Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2020). Developing and validating a scale for the assessment of preservice teachers’ computational thinking. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1323–1343.

Bahroun, Z., Anane, C., Ahmed, V., & Zacca, A. (2023). Transforming education: A comprehensive review of generative artificial intelligence in educational settings through bibliometric and content analysis. Sustainability, 15(17), Article 12983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712983

Bandono, A., & Pramujiono, A. (2025). Landasan teknologi pendidikan. Madza Media.

Brennan, K. A., & Resnick, M. (2012, April 16). Using artifact-based interviews to study the development of computational thinking in interactive media design. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada. https://scratched.gse.harvard.edu/stories/scratch-and-scratched-aera-2012

Chao, P. Y. (2022). The impact of a no-code web development course on students’ attitudes toward computing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(2), 488–513

Dúo-Terrón, P. (2023). Analysis of Scratch software in scientific production for 20 years: Programming in education to develop computational thinking and STEAM disciplines. Education Sciences, 13(4), Article 404. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040404

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051

Li, Q (2023). The effect of Scratch programming on primary students’ digital creativity.

Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012

Marifah, S. N., Mu’iz, D. A., Wahid, R., M. (2022). Systematic Literatur Review : Integrasi Conputational Thinking dalam Kurikulum Sekolah Dasar di Indonesia. Creative of Learning Students Elementary, 5(5), 928-938. https://doi.org/10.22460/collase.v5i5.12148

McHugh, S., Carroll, N., & Connolly, C. (2024). Low-code and no-code in secondary education—Empowering teachers to embed citizen development in schools. Computers in the Schools, 41(4), 399–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2023.2256729

Moreno-León, J., & Robles, G. (2020). The effect of integrated Scratch lessons on computational thinking skills. IEEE Transactions on Education, 63(2), 113–119

Sari, R. P (2023). Tantangan guru dalam implementasi literasi digital dan koding di Indonesia.

Su, J., & Yang, W. (2023). A systematic review of integrating computational thinking in early childhood education. Computers and Education Open, 4, Article 100122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100122

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

World Economic Forum. (2020). Schools of the future: Defining new models of education for the fourth industrial revolution. https://www.weforum.org/publications/schools-of-the-future-defining-new-models-of-education-for-the-fourth-industrial-revolution/

Zhang, L., & Nouri, J. (2019). A systematic review of learning computational thinking through Scratch in K-9. Computers & Education, 141, Article 103607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103607