Pendekatan Partai Politik Turki terhadap Kewirausahaan dalam Program Kepartaian: Sebuah Kajian Kritis

Authors

  • Utami Tunjung Sari Kewirausahaan, Universitas Widya Mataram, Indonesia
  • Ascasaputra Aditya Manajemen, Universitas Widya Mataram, Indonesia
  • Bhenu Artha Kewirausahaan, Universitas Widya Mataram, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36456/p.v6i1.11469

Keywords:

Partai Politik, Kewirausahaan, Ekonomi Politik, Critical Review, Program Partai

Abstract

Artikel ini bertujuan mengevaluasi artikel Esen tahun 2012 yang mengidentifikasi sejauh mana partai-partai politik di Turki dalam mengintegrasikan konsep kewirausahaan ke dalam program kepartaiannya. Kajian ini yang menempatkan kewirausahaan tidak hanya sebagai isu ekonomi, tetapi juga sebagai bagian strategi politik partai membangun legitimasi publik dan merespons perubahan ekonomi global. Argumen peneliti adalah program partai yang berfungsi sebagai komitmen kebijakan kepada pemilih, sehingga frekuensi penyebutan terminologi bisnis mencerminkan sikap partai terhadap pengembangan sektor swasta. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan critical review yang menelaah validitas metodologis, kontribusi konseptual, dan relevansi kontekstual penelitian Esen tahun 2012. Penelitian tersebut memiliki kontribusi penting dalam memetakan hubungan antara partai politik dan kewirausahaan dalam rentang sejarah yang panjang. Namun, penggunaan analisis berbasis frekuensi kata dinilai masih belum mampu menangkap konteks ideologis, makna politik, serta implementasi kebijakan ekonomi secara mendalam. Penelitian ini yang menegaskan pentingnya pendekatan ekonomi politik yang lebih komprehensif dalam mengkaji relasi antara ideologi partai, retorika politik, dan kebijakan kewirausahaan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bonotti, M., & Weinstock, D. (2021). Introduction: Parties, electoral systems and political theory. Representation, 57(3), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2021.1960590

Elbahnasawy, N. G., & Sweidan, O. D. (2026). Do political parties shape global risk? Evidence from United States presidential leadership and geopolitical volatility. International Economics, 185, 100658. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INTECO.2025.100658

Elcott, D. (2025). Populism and the political party: The enablers. International Journal of Public Leadership, 21(3), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-01-2025-0004

Esen, S. (2012). The approaches of turkish political parties towards entrepreneurship in their party programmes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 602–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.101

Franzke, S., Wu, J., Froese, F. J., & Chan, Z. X. (2022). Female entrepreneurship in Asia: a critical review and future directions. Asian Business and Management, 21(3), 343–372. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-022-00186-2

Henry, A., & Liu, M. (2026). In search of a “big idea”: A critical review of the function of comparison processes in language learning psychology. In System (Vol. 137). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103923

Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5–6), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00033-0

Lara-Rodríguez, J. S. (2026). Beyond armed and unarmed: political parties and violent institutions during a peace process. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-06-2025-0181

Li, Y., Cao, K., & Jenatabadi, H. S. (2023). Effect of entrepreneurial education and creativity on entrepreneurial intention in college students: mediating entrepreneurial inspiration, mindset, and self-efficiency. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1240910

Neneh, B. N. (2022). Entrepreneurial passion and entrepreneurial intention: the role of social support and entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 587–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1770716

Newman, A., Obschonka, M., Schwarz, S., Cohen, M., & Nielsen, I. (2019). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: A systematic review of the literature on its theoretical foundations, measurement, antecedents, and outcomes, and an agenda for future research. Dalam Journal of Vocational Behavior (Vol. 110, hlm. 403–419). Academic Press Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.05.012

Obschonka, M., Silbereisen, R. K., Cantner, U., & Goethner, M. (2015). Entrepreneurial self-identity: Predictors and effects within the theory of planned behavior framework. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(4), 773–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9385-2

Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.10.007

Ratten, V. (2023). Entrepreneurship: Definitions, opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 42(5), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22217

Xiao, B., Liu, Q., Piao, G., & Liu, Y. (2026). The influence of entrepreneurial spirit and environmental perception on entrepreneurial intentions: A mediation model of entrepreneurial competence. Acta Psychologica, 265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106713

Downloads

Published

28-04-2026

How to Cite

Pendekatan Partai Politik Turki terhadap Kewirausahaan dalam Program Kepartaian: Sebuah Kajian Kritis. (2026). PACIVIC: Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 6(1), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.36456/p.v6i1.11469

Similar Articles

1-10 of 16

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.