IDENTIFIKASI HUBUNGAN ARSITEKTUR DAN ARTEFAK KOTA: STUDI TERHADAP RUMAH SAKIT DARMO, SURABAYA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36456/418ev332Keywords:
Arsitektur, Artefak Kota, Darmo, G.C Citroen, Memori Kolektif, SurabayaAbstract
Darmo Hospital in Surabaya is a historical building that embodies both historical significance and distinctive colonial architectural design by G.C. Citroen. This study aims to identify the relationship between the building’s architecture and its role in shaping Surabaya’s city identity. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed through field observations, documentation of architectural elements, and literature studies, focusing on aspects of memory, distinctiveness, and design. The findings reveal that Darmo Hospital not only symbolizes the adaptation of colonial architecture to the tropical climate but also preserves the collective memory of residents as a monumental building marking the development of the Darmo area. The authenticity of its design, which has been maintained to the present day, reinforces its function as an urban artifact that plays a significant role in the historical dynamics and identity of Surabaya.
References
[1] A. Rossi, The architecture of the city. MIT press, 1984.
[2] A. Rossi, La arquitectura de la ciudad. Editorial GG, 2015.
[3] F. Wardhani, “Kajian Identitas Pusat Kota Lama Bengkulu Dengan Referensi Rossi dan Trancik,” Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, 2015.
[4] L. K. Wardani, “Fungsi, makna dan simbol (sebuah kajian teoritik),” 2010.
[5] A. S. Muljadinata and B. Widiantoro, “Karsten’s Work as a City Branding Strengthener for The Semarang City, Indonesia,” Journal of Architecture and Human Experience, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–22, 2023.
[6] M. I. Perkasa, B. Soemardiono, and H. R. Santosa, “PERKEMBANGAN MORFOLOGI KAWASAN CAGAR BUDAYA DARMO SURABAYA TAHUN 1905-1943,” Jurnal Arsitektur ARCADE, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 403–409, 2022.
[7] D. Rosmalia, “Identifikasi elemen fisik kebudayaan kraton sebagai pembentuk ruang lanskap budaya kota cirebon,” Media Matrasain, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 44–53, 2015.
[8] A. J. Tallo, Y. Pratiwi, and I. Astutik, “Identifikasi pola morfologi kota (Studi kasus: sebagian Kecamatan Klojen, di Kota Malang),” Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 213–227, 2014.
[9] M. A. J. Irawan and R. Refranisa, “Konsep Perancangan Tugu Intermoda Sebagai Landmark Dalam Fenomena Iconisasi,” Journal of Architectural Design and Development (JAD), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2023.
[10] R. Rahmawati, J. P. Widodo, A. Fitriany, and J. J. K. Pos, “SEJARAH SUNGAI KALIMAS SEBAGAI JALUR TRANSPORTASI DI KOTA SURABAYA TAHUN 1910-1942 (HISTORY OF THE KALIMAS RIVER AS A TRANSPORTATION ROUTE IN THE CITY OF SURABAYA 1910-1942)”.
[11] M. C. Ricklefs, Sejarah Indonesia Modern 1200–2008. Penerbit Serambi, 2008.
[12] A. Ramadhani and A. B. Tribhuwaneswari, “Push And Pull Factor dalam Proses Habitat Selection Akibat Keberadaan Kegiatan Pendidikan Tinggi di Kawasan Perumahan Siwalankerto, Kota Surabaya, Jawa Timur (Habitat Selection Process Due to Exixtence of Higher Education Activities Siwalankerto Housing Area, Surabaya City, East Java),” Seminar Nasional Kota Berkelanjutan, pp. 141–159, May 2018, doi: 10.25105/psnkb.v1i1.2897.
[13] P. Basundoro, “Situs Industri Kota Surabaya: Warisan dari Masa Kolonial sampai Awal Kemerdekaan,” 2011.
[14] F. W. Roosinda et al., Metode penelitian kualitatif. Zahir Publishing, 2021.
[15] S. Jo, “Aldo Rossi: architecture and memory,” Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 231–237, 2003.
[16] E. V. DANILOVA, “ALDO RUSSI THEORY OF URBAN FACTS: ORIGINS AND IDEAS,” Urban construction and architecture, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 52–58, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.17673/vestnik.2020.03.8.
[17] W. H, SK WALIKOTAMADYA NO. 188.45/251/402.1.04/1996 Tentang Penetapan Bangunan Cagar Budaya di Wilayah Kotamadya Kepala Daerah Tingkat II Surabaya. Surabaya, 1996.
[18] PERDA Kota Surabaya, Peraturan Daerah Kota Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Pelestarian dan Pengelolaan Cagar Budaya. Surabaya: Dinas Kebudayaan Kepemudaan dan Olah Raga serta Pariwisata, 2024.
[19] P. Burke, Sejarah dan teori sosial. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2015.
[20] P. Basundoro, Sejarah Pemerintahan Kota Surabaya Sejak Masa Kolonial Sampai Masa Reformasi (1960-2012). Departemen Ilmu Sejarah FIB Unair, 2012.
[21] Dinas Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata, Peraturan Daerah Kota Nomor 5 Tahun 2005 tentang Pelestarian Bangunan dan/atau Lingkungan Cagar Budaya. Surabaya, 2005.
[22] H. P. Berlage, Mijn Indische reis: gedachten over cultuur en kunst. WL & J. Brusse, 1931.
[23] J. T. Santoso, Cosman Citroen (1881-1935): Architect in ‘booming’Soerabaja. Uitgeverij Verloren, 2018.
[24] H. Akihary, “Architectuur & stedebouw in Indonesie, 1870-1970,” (No Title), 1990.
[25] H. Handinoto, “Handinoto, H. (2008). Daendels Dan Perkembangan Arsitektur Di Hindia Belanda Abad 19.,” Dimensi: Journal of Architecture and Built Environmen, vol. 1, no. 36, pp. 45–53, 2008.
[26] P. K. M. van Roosmalen, “Familiar, yet different. Indische architecture and town planning,” Groniek, no. 174, 2007.
[27] A. Vidler, Histories of the immediate present: inventing architectural modernism. Mit Press, 2008.
