Analisis Risiko Overpressure Pada Propylene Recovery Unit Dengan FMEA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36456/wkscyx49Abstract
The Propylene Recovery Unit (PRU) is exposed to overpressure risk caused by process control disturbances, instrumentation failures, pressure protection failures, and human error. This study aimed to analyze overpressure risk in a PRU using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). Data were obtained through process observation, literature review, and severity, occurrence, and detection assessment of critical components. Eight failure modes were identified: uncontrolled distillation column pressure, stuck PRV/PSV, pressure transmitter error, stuck control valve, pressurized pipe leakage, heat exchanger fouling, HIPPS failure, and operational human error. The results showed that operational human error had the highest RPN of 280, followed by pressure transmitter error with 245, stuck PRV/PSV with 240, and stuck control valve with 240. These findings indicate that overpressure risk is influenced by human factors, instrumentation reliability, pressure protection, and process control performance. Recommended mitigations include operator training, instrumentation calibration, PRV/PSV testing, and control valve improvement.
References
[1] J. Zhang, H. Ren, H. Ren, Y. Chai, Z. Liu, and X. Liang, “Comprehensive Review of Safety Studies in Process Industrial Systems: Concepts, Progress, and Main Research Topics,” Processes, vol. 11, no. 8, p. 2454, 2023, doi: 10.3390/pr11082454.
[2] M. A. Jumali, Rusdiyantoro, A. R. Maulidah, and Y. Utomo, “Rearranging First-In First-Out (FIFO) Parts Layouts,” PROZIMA (Productivity, Optim. Manuf. Syst. Eng., vol. 6, no. 2 SE-Articles, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.21070/prozima.v6i2.1580.
[3] M. A. Jumali and E. B. Utomo, “CHANGE-ORIENTED LEADERSHIP : SAFETY COMMITMENT OR PERFORMANCE BEHAVIOR,” J. Tek. WAKTU, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 36–46, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.unipasby.ac.id/index.php/waktu/article/view/1666/1542
[4] P. Schmitz, P. Swuste, G. Reniers, and K. van Nunen, “Predicting Major Accidents in the Process Industry Based on the Barrier Status at Scenario Level: A Practical Approach,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., vol. 71, p. 104519, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104519.
[5] M. A. Jumali, Rusdiyantoro, Yitno Utomo, Moch. Fatur Aangga Pratama, and Harno Suntoko, “Implementation of Workplace Safety in the Welding Industry: Challenges and Solutions,” Tibuana, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2025, doi: 10.36456/tibuana.8.1.9978.9-14.
[6] M. S. Ab Rahim, G. Reniers, M. Yang, and S. Bajpai, “Risk Assessment Methods for Process Safety, Process Security and Resilience in the Chemical Process Industry: A Thorough Literature Review,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., vol. 88, p. 105274, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105274.
[7] M. A. Ridho and M. A. Jumali, “ANALISIS PENJADWALAN PEMELIHARAAN AC DI FAKULTAS TEKNIK,” in SEMNASTEK 2017, 2017, no. iii, pp. 198–204. [Online]. Available: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ch3y8qThU5hxU0wcGP78AB-0lgva3QHm/view
[8] Shilfira Nova Pratiwi and Muhamad Abdul Jumali, “Imlementasi Metode Line Balancing Guna Perbaikan Proses Produksi Di PT. Sol Sepatu Di Sidoarjo,” Semin. Nas. Has. Ris. dan Pengabdi., vol. 6, no. SE-Penelitian, Jul. 2024, [Online]. Available: https://snhrp.unipasby.ac.id/prosiding/index.php/snhrp/article/view/1146
[9] P. Kuchekar, R. Sutar, and P. Patil, “Assessing the Critical Factors Leading to the Failure of Pressure Relief Valves: A Case Study,” Processes, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 820, 2024, doi: 10.3390/pr121100820.
[10] T. Yuri and R. Nurcahyo, TQM manajemen kualitas total dalam perspektif teknik industri. Jakarta: Indeks, 2013.
[11] A. Cahyono and M. A. Jumali, “INCREASING THE PRODUCTIVITY OF THE FURNITURE INDUSTRY WITH KAIZEN CASE STUDY IN SBRC FURNITURE JEPARA,” J. Ind. Eng. Manag., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 69–78, 2023.
[12] M. A. Bin Yusof and N. H. B. Abdullah, “Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) of Butterfly Valve in Oil and Gas Industry,” J. Eng. Sci. Technol., vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 9–19, 2016.
[13] M. Shi, Z. Cao, and T. Ye, “Internal Leakage Rate Prediction and Failure Diagnosis of Buried Pipeline Ball Valve Based on Valve Cavity Pressure Detection,” Flow Meas. Instrum., vol. 89, p. 102303, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2022.102303.
[14] I. Mustapha et al., “Investigation of Internal Gas Leakage on the Gate Valve Using Acoustic Signal,” Int. J. Integr. Eng., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 57–65, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/ijie/article/view/7494
[15] S. Hassan, J. Wang, C. Kontovas, and M. Bashir, “Modified FMEA Hazard Identification for Cross-Country Petroleum Pipeline Using Fuzzy Rule Base and Approximate Reasoning,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., vol. 74, p. 104616, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104616.
[16] A. Carro, A. Gonzalez, and G. Caceres, “FMEA and Risk Assessment for Thermochemical Energy Storage Systems,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 19, p. 6013, 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14196013.
[17] R. M. Jannah, S. Supriyadi, and A. Nalhadi, “Analisis Efektivitas pada Mesin Centrifugal dengan Menggunakan Metode Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE),” Pros. Semin. Nas. Ris. Ter. SENASSET, no. 2013, pp. 170–175, 2017.
[18] K. Sotoodeh, “Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) of Pipeline Ball Valves in the Offshore Industry,” J. Fail. Anal. Prev., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1175–1183, 2020.
[19] D. S. Dhamayanti, J. Alhilman, and N. Athari, “Usulan Preventive Maintenance Pada Mesin Komori Ls440 Dengan Menggunakan Metode Reliability Centered Maintenance (Rcm Ii) Dan Risk Based Maintenance (Rbm) Di Pt Abc,” J. Rekayasa Sist. Ind., vol. 3, no. 02, p. 31, 2016, doi: 10.25124/jrsi.v3i02.29.
[20] D. Triwardani, A. Rahman, and C. Tantrika, “Analisis Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) dalam Meminimalisi Six Big Losses Pada Mesin Produksi Dual Filters DD07 (studi kasus : PT. Filtrona Indonesia, Surabaya, Jawa Timur,” Jur. Tek. Ind. Univ. Brawijaya, vol. 07, pp. 379–391, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/127943-ID-analisis-overall-equipment-effectiveness.pdf
[21] B. Prasisko and M. A. Jumali, “Indentifikasi Jalur Kritis pada Proses Pemindahan Sarana Produksi Krimer Retail dengan Metode CPM pada PT X,” Fact. J. Ind. Manaj. dan Rekayasa Sist. Ind., vol. 4, no. 2 SE-Articles, pp. 246–257, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.56211/factory.v4i2.1382.
[22] F. Fassa, A. Soekiman, and A. Wibowo, “Manajemen Risiko di Industri Konstruksi Periode 2017 s. d 2020: Tinjauan Sistematis dan Analisis Konten,” Simp. Nas. Teknol. Infrastruktur Abad Ke-21, Febr., 2021.
[23] G. Popov, B. K. Lyon, and B. D. Hollcroft, Risk Assessment: A Practical Guide to Assessing Operational Risks. Wiley, 2022.
[24] I. O. for Standardization, “ISO 31010:2019 Risk Management: Risk Assessment Techniques.” International Organization for Standardization, 2019.
[25] D. Bertsimas and N. Kallus, “From Predictive to Prescriptive Analytics,” Manage. Sci., vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 1025–1044, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2018.3253.
[26] C. A. Naranjo, “A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions,” Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 239–245, 1981, doi: 10.1038/clpt.1981.154.
[27] H. Sun, H. Wang, M. Yang, and G. Reniers, “Resilience-Based Approach to Safety Barrier Performance Assessment in Process Facilities,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., vol. 73, p. 104599, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104599.
[28] J. D. Burlison, R. R. Quillivan, L. M. Kath, Y. Zhou, and ..., “A multilevel analysis of US hospital patient safety culture relationships with perceptions of voluntary event reporting,” Journal of patient …. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415419/
[29] G. Ye, K. Xu, and W. Wu, “Mixed Multiple-Variable Modelling of Acoustic Emission Signals for Valve Internal Leakage Detection,” IET Sci. Meas. Technol., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 487–498, 2021, doi: 10.1049/smt2.12049.
[30] Indonesia.Badan Standardisasi Nasional, Peraturan Badan Standardisasi Nasional Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Peraturan Badan Standardisasi Nasional Nomor 4 Tahun 2021 tentang Skema Penilaian Kesesuaian terhadap Standar Nasional Indonesia Sektor Pertanian, Perkebunan, Peternaka. Indonesia, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://jdih.bsn.go.id/dokumen-hukum-detail/Peraturan-Badan-Standardisasi-Nasional-Nomor-4-Tahun-2023-tentang-Perubahan-Kedua-Atas-Peraturan-Badan-Standardisasi-Nasional-Nomor-4-Tahun-2021-tentang-Skema-Penilaian-Kesesuaian-terhadap-Standar-Nasional-Indon
[31] ANSI/ASSP, “ANSI/ASSP Z590.3-2021 Prevention Through Design: Guidelines for Addressing Occupational Hazards and Risks in Design and Redesign Processes.” American Society of Safety Professionals, 2021.
[32] K. Sotoodeh, “Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) of Pipeline Ball Valves in the Offshore Industry,” J. Fail. Anal. Prev., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1175–1183, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11668-020-00919-8.
[33] A. Maniram Kumar, S. Rajakarunakaran, P. Pitchipoo, and R. Vimalesan, “Fuzzy Based Risk Prioritisation in an Auto LPG Dispensing Station,” Saf. Sci., vol. 101, pp. 231–247, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.011.
[34] R. Zhang, T. Chen, Y. Wang, and M. Short, “Systems approaches for sustainable fisheries: A comprehensive review and future perspectives,” Sustain. Prod. Consum., vol. 41, pp. 242–252, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.08.013.
